<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angle of Approach Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/09/22/angle-of-approach-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/09/22/angle-of-approach-testing/</link>
	<description>Just another Groklab.org weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Herman</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/09/22/angle-of-approach-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=165#comment-21</guid>
		<description>If there are extreme &quot;lobes&quot; in a transmission pattern, can these lobes be attenuated by some kind of masking?  I did measure different RSSI between cases of a mote and the same mote with a bit of antistatic bad (mylar) taped onto the F-antenna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are extreme &#8220;lobes&#8221; in a transmission pattern, can these lobes be attenuated by some kind of masking?  I did measure different RSSI between cases of a mote and the same mote with a bit of antistatic bad (mylar) taped onto the F-antenna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gthomas</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/09/22/angle-of-approach-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>gthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=165#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Good point Ted, and one that&#039;s been on my mind a lot last week.  We don&#039;t have great equipment to test whether these signals are polarized one way or the other or what polarities the motes are good at picking up.  There may be orientation effects; they were not varied in this experiment, nor in many that we&#039;ve been doing.  We&#039;ll add that to our list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Ted, and one that&#8217;s been on my mind a lot last week.  We don&#8217;t have great equipment to test whether these signals are polarized one way or the other or what polarities the motes are good at picking up.  There may be orientation effects; they were not varied in this experiment, nor in many that we&#8217;ve been doing.  We&#8217;ll add that to our list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Herman</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/09/22/angle-of-approach-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=165#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Is the angular variation entirely determined by the transmitter, or does the angle of the receiver matter equally?  Did you test this in some experiments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the angular variation entirely determined by the transmitter, or does the angle of the receiver matter equally?  Did you test this in some experiments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

