<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obstacle interference test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/08/26/obstacle-interference-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/08/26/obstacle-interference-test/</link>
	<description>Just another Groklab.org weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of the Antenna Analysis &#171; Hand Hygiene</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/08/26/obstacle-interference-test/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>State of the Antenna Analysis &#171; Hand Hygiene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=70#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] various regions of the RSSI, such as providing greater separation between distances or orientations.Obstacle Interferance (inside puck) &#8211; one horizontal, one vertical, distance .55m. various obstacles:&#160; person, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] various regions of the RSSI, such as providing greater separation between distances or orientations.Obstacle Interferance (inside puck) &#8211; one horizontal, one vertical, distance .55m. various obstacles:&nbsp; person, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E M</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/08/26/obstacle-interference-test/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>E M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=70#comment-6</guid>
		<description>yes. also the standard deviation of the readings goes way up when the roomba was introduced in between the two motes, meaning that any single rssi reading with a computer-like object in the middle will be less accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. also the standard deviation of the readings goes way up when the roomba was introduced in between the two motes, meaning that any single rssi reading with a computer-like object in the middle will be less accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gthomas</title>
		<link>http://groklab.org/handhygiene/2009/08/26/obstacle-interference-test/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>gthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groklab.org/handhygiene/?p=70#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Good experiment.  So what it says, if I&#039;m interpreting your data correctly, is that standing between two motes doesn&#039;t seem to affect them very much.  However, holding a large metal object, like a laptop (which is about the size of a Roomba), probably drops the signal down by 10-15%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good experiment.  So what it says, if I&#8217;m interpreting your data correctly, is that standing between two motes doesn&#8217;t seem to affect them very much.  However, holding a large metal object, like a laptop (which is about the size of a Roomba), probably drops the signal down by 10-15%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

